OpenAI ChatGPT GDPR Complaint in EU Over Misinformation Issue
OpenAI is a popular artificial intelligence research lab. It is currently under inspection as it faces a privacy complaint in the European Union. The complaint has been lodged by noyb. It is a nonprofit organization that champions privacy rights. The organization filed the complaint on behalf of an unnamed public figure, bringing to light a major issue with AI technologies.
The problem at hand is known as the ‘hallucination’ problem. It is a common issue with generative AI tools like ChatGPT. These tools, though impressive in their abilities sometimes generate information that is not accurate or is misleading. This becomes a significant concern when considering the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the EU. The GDPR has strict rules prevailing how the personal data of users within the region can be processed.
In this specific case, the complainant discovered that ChatGPT had generated an incorrect birth date for them. The GDPR provides individuals in the EU with the right to have incorrect data about them resolved. Noyb argues that OpenAI is failing to fulfill this responsibility with respect to the output of its chatbot.
This is not the first instance where OpenAI has faced such issues. In the past, the organization was bound to make changes to ChatGPT after interference by Italy’s data protection authority. This intervention led to a temporary shutdown of the chatbot in Italy.
The new complaint brings with it the potential for penalties for OpenAI. If found to be in violation of GDPR, the organization could face penalties as high as 4% of the company’s global annual turnover. This case serves as a plain reminder of the challenges that AI developers face in ensuring that their technologies are compliant with privacy regulations.
It also highlights the importance of ongoing dialogue and collaboration between AI developers, regulators, and the public. As AI technologies continue to progress and become more integrated into our daily lives, it is important that these technologies are developed and used in a way that respects and protects individual privacy rights. This case could potentially serve as an example for future cases involving AI technologies and privacy rights, and it will be interesting to see how it unfolds.
Read More: EyeEm AI Photo Licensing: Users Given 30 Days to Opt Out
Read More: Meta AI Shortcomings: Free but Fails to Validate Its Existence
